link to a book at amazon about him<\/a>.<\/p>\nAnd here is something from google groups (usenet)\u00a0 about him suing Senator Orrin Hatch in 1999.\u00a0 The US Senate passed a resolution which provided legal help for Hatch in the case.\u00a0 According to other sources, the case was eventually dismissed.<\/p>\n
================================================================<\/p>\n
Archive-Name: gov\/us\/fed\/congress\/record\/1999\/nov\/19\/1999CRS14932C
\n[Congressional Record: November 19, 1999 (Senate)]
\n[Page S14932]
\nFrom the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
\n[DOCID:cr19no99pt2-145]<\/p>\n
AUTHORIZATION OF REPRESENTATION<\/p>\n
Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I now ask unanimous consent that the
\nSenate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. Res. 238 submitted
\nearlier by Senators Lott and Daschle.
\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the resolution by title.
\nThe legislative clerk read as follows:<\/p>\n
A resolution (S. Res. 238) to authorize representation of
\nMember of the Senate in the case of Brett <\/strong>Kimberlin<\/strong> v. Orrin
\nHatch, et al.<\/p>\nThere being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the
\nresolution.
\nMr. LOTT. Mr. President, this resolution concerns a civil action
\ncommenced by a pro se plaintiff in the United States District Court for
\nthe District of Columbia against Senator Hatch and a former member of
\nthe staff of the Judiciary Committee. The plaintiff is a federal
\nprisoner serving a sentence for offenses related to a series of
\nbombings in 1979. The complaint seeks damages from Senator Hatch and
\nstaff for their alleged role in the United States Parole Commission’s
\n1997 revocation of the plaintiff’s parole for failure to satisfy an
\noutstanding civil judgment against him in favor of one of the victims
\nof his bombings.
\nThe plaintiff’s claims of unfairness and political bias in his parole
\nrevocation hearing have already been rejected by the federal district
\ncourt in Maryland in habeas corpus proceedings initiated by the
\nplaintiff.
\nThis resolution authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent
\nSenator Hatch in this action. The Senate Legal Counsel will seek
\ndismissal of the suit for failure to state a claim for relief and for
\nother reasons.
\nMs. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
\nresolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, the motion to
\nreconsider be laid upon the table, and finally that any statements
\nrelated to the resolution be printed in the Record.
\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
\nThe resolution (S. Res. 238) was agreed to.
\nThe preamble was agreed to.
\nThe resolution, with its preamble, reads as follows:<\/p>\n
S. Res. 238<\/p>\n
Whereas, in the case of Brett <\/strong>Kimberlin<\/strong> v. Orrin Hatch, et
\nal., C.A. No. 99-1590, pending in the United States District
\nCourt for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff has named
\nas a defendant Senator Orrin G. Hatch;
\nWhereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the
\nEthics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a)
\nand 288c(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend
\nMembers of the Senate in civil actions relating to their
\nofficial responsibilities: Now therefore, be it
\nResolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to
\nrepresent Senator Hatch in the case of Brett <\/strong>Kimberlin<\/strong> v.
\nOrrin Hatch, et al.<\/p>\n____________________<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[today’s run: none yet] Today is Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day.\u00a0 And since I couldn’t think of anything else, I will go with it. I’ve never met the guy.\u00a0 I don’t remember ever hearing of him before today. From what I understand, he is in prison and spends time drawing up lawsuits against bloggers.\u00a0\u00a0 Bloggers, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other-thoughts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2641"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2642,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641\/revisions\/2642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/w0ep.us\/OM\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}